آليات انتقال وتطبيق جودة التعليم الإلكتروني الجامعي بالعراق بقطاع الجامعي الخاص أنموذجا دراسة ميدانية
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aims to know the degree of achieving the mechanisms of academic e-learning quality for the outputs of university education institutions. It also aims to know the differences in the degree to which the mechanisms of academic e-learning quality and its outputs are achieved in university education institutions in light of the academic environment variables, including variables that have an impact on achieving the mechanisms of quality e-learning, which are (Academic title), (gender), (college specialization), (years of teaching experience), and in order to each alternative has three weights (3, 2, 1) The total score of the scale is (84), the minimum score (28) and the hypothetical mean (56). The researcher identified the research community from the private colleges in the governorates of Baghdad Diyala, Kirkuk and Basra, including teachers and students of private university education, and the total research sample was (120) teachers and students. The researcher extracted the psychometric characteristics of the research (honesty and consistency), as the apparent validity was achieved by presenting the tool to a number of arbitrators, and the apparent validity was extracted through the use of the discriminatory force method for the scale paragraphs, and the use of the method of the paragraph relationship to the total, and the stability was extracted according to the Alpha Cronbach method And the method of re-testing, and the researcher used the (SPSS) program to statistically analyze the sample answers, and statistical tests were chosen that fit the research objectives, and the results showed that the degree of achievement of the quality mechanisms of e-learning for university professors in universities, and the results showed that there are statistically significant differences in achieving the quality mechanisms. In electronic education for university education institutions in the variable of the scientific title and for the benefit of a group of scientific titles, meaning that those with the rank of professor and assistant professor have a greater level of quality mechanisms E-learning, as the results showed that there are differences in the gender variable and for the benefit of the teachers in the degree of their practice of the quality mechanisms of e-learning compared to even female teaching staff, and the results also showed that there are no differences in the variable of the faculty specialization, human and scientific, in the degree of practicing the mechanisms of quality e-learning for teachers, and the results showed that there are differences Significant in the years of experience variable and in favor of those with (6-12) years of experience in achieving a good level of achieving quality assurance, and in light of the research results, the researcher made a number of procedural recommendations and a number of proposals for future studies. achieve the research objectives, the researcher examined the literature and previous studies, and the researcher defined the descriptive approach to research, and the researcher conducted an exploratory study consisting of a number of The questions of a number of teaching staff at the university within the open and closed type questionnaire and the answers of the survey sample members were analyzed, which contributed to the support and construction of the research tool, as the research tool was built and designed in four main areas: (quality of outputs, quality assurance of teaching and training programs, graduation projects and research) Conferences, seminars and courses that you offer to serve the community) It consists of (28) for each area (7) paragraphs and has three alternatives (agreed, not agreed, neutral) and each alternative has three weights (3, 2, 1) The total score of the scale is (84), the minimum score (28) and the hypothetical mean (56). The researcher identified the research community from the private colleges in the governorates of Baghdad Diyala, Kirkuk and Basra, including teachers and students of private university education, and the total research sample was (120) teachers and students. The researcher extracted the psychometric characteristics of the research (honesty and consistency), as the apparent validity was achieved by presenting the tool to a number of arbitrators, and the apparent validity was extracted through the use of the discriminatory force method for the scale paragraphs, and the use of the method of the paragraph relationship to the total, and the stability was extracted according to the Alpha Cronbach method And the method of re-testing, and the researcher used the (SPSS) program to statistically analyze the sample answers, and statistical tests were chosen that fit the research objectives, and the results showed that the degree of achievement of the quality mechanisms of e-learning for university professors in universities, and the results showed that there are statistically significant differences in achieving the quality mechanisms. In electronic education for university education institutions in the variable of the scientific title and for the benefit of a group of scientific titles, meaning that those with the rank of professor and assistant professor have a greater level of quality mechanisms E-learning, as the results showed that there are differences in the gender variable and for the benefit of the teachers in the degree of their practice of the quality mechanisms of e-learning compared to even female teaching staff, and the results also showed that there are no differences in the variable of the faculty specialization, human and scientific, in the degree of practicing the mechanisms of quality e-learning for teachers, and the results showed that there are differences Significant in the years of experience variable and in favor of those with (6-12) years of experience in achieving a good level of achieving quality assurance, and in light of the research results, the researcher made a number of procedural recommendations and a number of proposals for future studies.